 |
|
 |
Page: 1 2
3
|
| I. Introduction |
|
This report is designed to inform the people of California about
the dimensions of the problems caused by alcohol, tobacco, and illicit
drugs and about public and private initiatives to reduce these problems
in their state. The intent is not to evaluate state efforts but
to highlight positive developments and to identify areas to be strengthened.
The report focuses on:
|
| |
the extent of alcohol, tobacco and illicit drug
use;.
drug and alcohol-related
crime;
impact on health;
costs of substance abuse;
and
California's response
to these problems.
|
|
|
This report is one in a series of state profiles prepared by Drug
Strategies, a nonprofit organization in Washington, D.C., dedicated
to promoting more effective approaches to the nation's drug problems.
This project is supported by a grant from the Robert Wood Johnson
Foundation.
In preparing this report, Drug Strategies worked with the California
Health and Welfare Agency, including the Department of Alcohol and
Drug Programs and the Department of Health Services (Office of AIDS
and Office of Tobacco Control). The Departments of Justice, Corrections,
Education, Alcoholic Beverage Control and Motor Vehicles were also
consulted, as were experts in prevention, education, treatment,
law enforcement, and criminal justice across the state. A distinguished
Advisory Panel guided the project. In addition, interviews with
federal and state program officials, care-givers from private treatment
facilities, and community groups held provide a comprehensive picture
of public and private efforts. While we are grateful for the insight
and wisdom of those who contributed to the preparation of this report,
Drug Strategies is solely responsible for its contents.
This profile will be distributed broadly in California to legis-
legislators, researchers, business leaders, private organizations,
government agencies and the media. We hope that it will increase
public understanding of substance abuse problems within the state,
as well as generate political and financial support for effective
policies.
|
II. California Profile |
|
California, with a population of 32 million, is the most heavily
popu- lated state in the nation. It is the third largest state geographically.
Residents come from a wide range of racial and ethnic groups, as
well as diverse social and economic circumstances. The proportion
of children in the population is growing, as is the proportion of
the population defined as ethnic minorities.
California has established a reputation for innovation whether dealing
with natural disasters or social problems. Innovation has also characterized
the states approach to its alcohol, tobacco and illicit drug abuse
problems.
State Policies and Programs:
The Department of Alcohol and Drug Programs (ADP), within the Health
and Welfare Agency, is the state's central resource on alcohol and
drug abuse prevention, treatment and research, overseeing all alcohol
and drug programs.
Created in 1978, ADP brought together the Office of Alcoholism (operating
under the Health and Welfare Agency) and the Division of Substance
Abuse (operating within the Department of Health under the Health
and Welfare Agency) as a single state authority on substance abuse
prevention and treatment. ADP works with the State Assembly Health
Committee and the Senate Select Committee on Substance Abuse, which
have primary jurisdiction over alcohol and drug abuse legislation.
For Fiscal Year 1995-96, ADP has a budget of approximately $335
million to support public prevention and treatment.
In the face of overall state budget reductions, California has maintained
level funding for treatment and prevention. Combined with increases
in funds from the federal government and other sources, this support
has resulted in an overall increase for ADP of $77 million from
Fiscal Year 1990-91 to 1995-96 an increase of 30 percent.
Bringing greater coherence to statewide policy formulation, Governor
Wilson expanded the Governor's Policy Council (GPC) on Drug and
Alcohol Abuse in 1991 to include health and human service directors
and business leaders. The expansion provided a venue to link together
policies and activities across state agencies, encouraging more
inter-agency collabo- ration. The GPC meets approximately twice
per year. The GPC has examined the relationship of drug arrests
and driving under the influence, out-of-school drug use, community
revitalization, prescription drug abuse and the elderly, treatment
effectiveness and opportunities for collaboration between agencies.
Counties also play a critical role in the state's response to substance
abuse. County alcohol and drug abuse directors are given significant
discretion regarding the use of prevention and treatment funds.
Community leadership and local initiatives have inspired many local
programs which ultimately have been implemented statewide.
California's 1992 Master Plan to Reduce Drug and Alcohol Abuse includes
goals established by the State Senate for prevention, treatment,
criminal justice, policy and planning. The plan is designed to reduce
California's most serious alcohol and other drug problems by the
year 2000. ADP leads the effort by coordinating the participation
of state and county agencies and the business community. With the
help of experts from the RAND Corporation, California has taken
a hard look at the strengths and weaknesses of existing data systems.
Research efforts thus far have resulted in the release of two seminal
studies: Evaluating Recovery Services: The California Drug and Alcohol
Treatment Assessment (CALDATA) and Profile of Alcohol and Drug Use
During Pregnancy in California. Established in 1989, the state Tobacco
Control Program was mandated by voter referendum in the landmark
California Tobacco Tax and Health Protection Act of 1988 (Proposition
99). The Tobacco Control Program has helped create public policies,
media campaigns, workplace initiatives and a local program infrastructure
which mobilizes communities to reduce exposure to secondhand smoke;
to restrict youth access to tobacco; and to counter pro-tobacco
influences in the community.
|
| |
Page: 1 2
3
|
|